Point Source Studio Monitors
Point Source Studio Monitors – Coaxial studio monitors, such as Fluid Audio FX50 or Tannoy Gold 5 with their tweeter nestled within the woofer cone, have become a tempting proposition for audio engineers seeking a precise and revealing listening experience. But this unique design approach comes with its own set of considerations. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the pros and cons of coaxial monitors to help you decide if they’re the right fit for your studio.
RECORD, MIX AND MASTER – A BEGINNER’S GUIDE TO AUDIO PRODUCTION
Pros:
Superior Imaging: The magic of coaxials lies in their “point source” design. By having the tweeter and woofer aligned on the same axis, the sound originates from a single point in space. This translates to a more accurate stereo image, where instruments and vocals are precisely localized within the soundstage. Imagine the difference between pinpointing a pinpoint of light versus a blurry blob – that’s the level of detail you can expect with good coaxial monitors.
Wide Sweet Spot: Traditional studio monitors often have a narrow “sweet spot” – the ideal listening position where the sound is most balanced. Move even slightly off-axis, and the mix can sound dramatically different. Coaxial monitors, on the other hand, boast a wider sweet spot. This is because the time and phase relationships between the tweeter and woofer remain consistent across a larger listening area. This allows for more flexibility in your studio setup and eliminates the constant struggle to find that perfect head position.
Time Coherence: Sound consists of waves with different frequencies arriving at our ears at slightly different times. Traditional monitors, with separate drivers for different frequencies, can introduce phase cancellation – where certain frequencies partially or completely cancel each other out, leading to an uneven sound. In coaxial designs, due to the time-aligned nature of the drivers, this phase cancellation is minimized. The result? A more natural and cohesive sound across the entire frequency spectrum, where transients (sudden attacks of sound) are reproduced with exceptional accuracy.
Nearfield Listening: Coaxial monitors often shine in nearfield applications, where the listener sits very close to the speakers. This is because the point source design minimizes the comb filtering effect that can occur with traditional monitors at close distances. This makes them ideal for smaller studios or when detailed mixing decisions are needed.
Cons:
Limited Low-End: To accommodate the tweeter in the center, coaxial woofers tend to be smaller than those found in traditional monitors. While some coaxials compensate with advanced woofer designs and powerful amplification, the overall low-frequency extension might be less pronounced. If deep bass is crucial for your productions, you may need to pair coaxials with a dedicated subwoofer.
Cost Factor: Coaxial technology requires more complex engineering and manufacturing compared to traditional monitors. This often translates to a higher price tag. Before taking the plunge, consider if the benefits outweigh the additional cost.
Design Trade-offs: Balancing the performance of the woofer and tweeter within the same coaxial driver can be a delicate act. Some listeners might find the sound character of coaxials to be different from what they’re accustomed to. There might be a slight emphasis on the high-mids due to the tweeter’s proximity to the woofer cone. It’s essential to audition coaxials yourself to see if their sonic signature complements your workflow.
Limited Selection: While the popularity of coaxial monitors is growing, the selection available is still smaller compared to traditional designs. This might limit your options in terms of size, budget, and specific features.
Conclusion:
Coaxial studio monitors are not a one-size-fits-all solution. They excel in nearfield applications where precise imaging, wide sweet spot, and time coherence are crucial. However, their potentially limited low-end and different sound character require careful consideration. If you primarily work in smaller studios, prioritize detailed mixing decisions, and are comfortable with a potentially “brighter” sound signature, coaxials could be a valuable asset. For those who crave a powerful low-end and are comfortable with a larger traditional monitor setup, there’s nothing wrong with sticking to the tried-and-true approach. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and listening preferences. Consider demoing both coaxial and traditional studio monitors to hear the difference for yourself and make an informed decision.
